Bridget Macron claims to be a trans lady named Jean Michel Trogruza Credit score
French President Emmanuel Macron and his spouse Bridget Macron are pursuing authorized motion in US courts to counter false claims that Bridget was born male. The defamation lawsuit filed in Delaware Superior Courtroom in July 2025 targets right-wing commentator Candice Owens.
Allegations suggesting Bridget Macron is a transgender lady named Jean Michel Troglew has been extensively debunked. Owens promoted these claims by way of an eight-part podcast sequence and different social media posts, even though they don’t have any actual foundation. Macron’s authorized group claims the assertion was false, defamatory and brought on critical misery. Macron will current scientific and photographic proof in courtroom to disprove his claims. Their lawyer, Tom Claire, stated the proof contains skilled testimony and private images of Bridget Macron. Claire famous that presenting such proof is important to revive the reality and defend Bridget’s honor whereas emotionally taxing.
Owens argues that her assertion is protected as free speech beneath the First Modification. She questioned whether or not Delaware courts have jurisdiction and filed an movement dismissing the case, difficult Macron to indicate that she was capable of show that she acted “really malicious.” The courts ought to consider these authorized questions because the proceedings proceed. This US case follows earlier French authorized motion. In that case, Bridget Macron and her brother efficiently filed a defamation lawsuit in opposition to two bloggers who unfold the identical rumor. Nonetheless, the choice was overturned by an enchantment in 2025 on free speech grounds. With the reversal, Macron urges them to pursue authorized reliance in the US, the place they hope that Owens might be held accountable for the circulation of false data.
Macron’s lawsuit seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages. It additionally goals to ship a broader message in regards to the private and public penalties of disinformation. The couple’s authorized group emphasizes the significance of defending people’ reputations in opposition to unfounded conspiracy theories, particularly in an age when digital platforms can amplify false claims to giant audiences.
Observers observe that the case highlights the challenges public figures face when preventing disinformation, balancing authorized protections without spending a dime speech. It additionally highlights the non-public sacrifices that such claims can take, particularly when it pertains to delicate points of a person’s private life.
Because the lawsuit unfolds, Macron continues to decide to falsely presenting the allegations. Their authorized technique focuses on rebutting the claims and offering clear and compelling proof to guard Bridget Macron’s public and private id.
The incident continues to draw worldwide consideration, reflecting broader debates on the accountability of social media influencers, the restrictions of freedom of speech, and mechanisms out there to handle misinformation within the digital age.